By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Here’s an intuitive belief that many who work in the field of law might adhere to: More information leads to better decisions. Those who work in the social sciences, however, know that this does not always hold true. Based on the higher “cognitive load,” higher levels of information can also […]
Testimony Mode: Note the Tradeoff Between Information Density and Juror Sensitivity Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Arriving for the preparation meeting, the witness notices that there’s someone new in the room: a communications consultant. A non-lawyer visiting from out-of-town, the consultant is introduced by the lawyer as a specialist in legal communication and as someone who “is here to help us prepare for your testimony.” Over
Consider the ‘Message Effect’ of Inviting a Consultant to Help Your Witness Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The idea is a merger of pop culture with academics. In pop culture, “truthiness” refers facetiously to the feeling of something being true, independent of its actual truth value (a term coined by late-night comedian, Stephen Colbert). Academics, however, have creatively adopted the term to describe the real phenomenon that occurs when
Witnesses, Add to Your ‘Truthiness’ by Showing Pictures Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: A few years ago, I had the opportunity to attend every day of a civil trial, and then interview all of the jurors at the end of their service. I planned out a very comprehensive interview for each of them, including running through the witness lists from all parties, and
Direct Examination: Start With a Goal, Not an Outline Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: “Looking back at this situation, what if anything would you do differently?” Witnesses can be asked that question in a variety of case types: medical malpractice, products liability, contract, fraud, and really anything that involves a conceivably questionable past decision. And this question can be tricky to answer. For the
Don’t Enter That Time Machine: Carefully Answer “What Would You Have Done Differently?” Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Q: At the time you signed the contract, did you believe that all of your business partners had the capacity to comply with its terms? A: Well, here is what was going on when I signed the contract: The business was growing massively, and our capacity was increasing by the
Witnesses, Treat It As a Question, Not a Topic Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: As we are moving up yet another hill on the pandemic case-count rollercoaster, hopefully the last rise before the final descent into a vaccine landing zone, courts are once again pulling back in–person trials, while lawyers look for ways to stay prepared using virtual tools. Along with web-conferenced hearings and
Prepare Your Witness Virtually: Seven Best Practices Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: When preparing a witness, there can sometimes be a strong impulse to say, “Just answer the question.” That impulse comes from an appropriate desire to keep things simple, and to keep the witness from wandering or waffling. But it can be bad advice. The choice to just answer the question on
Witnesses: Answer Both the Language of the Question and Its Implication Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: As a sign of just how serious the coronavirus pandemic is getting, the President has finally appeared in public with a mask. The precaution of wearing a face mask is still highly politicized, but it is slowly catching on. In the planning process of courts that are moving toward resuming trials,
Face It: Masks Don’t Hinder Credibility Assessment Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: These days, instead of spending our days in offices, conference rooms, and courthouses, we are likely spending those days in front of laptop web-cameras, negotiating our business lives in this new medium. I have noticed that even some contacts that used to be handled by telephone, are now becoming web-conferences.
Web-Conferencing? Don’t Let Your Energy Zoom Away Read More »