By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In the case of any argument or persuasive appeal you are making, you can ask the question, “Who are you aiming at?” In a jury trial, your answer might be, “The jury, of course.” But who on that jury are you aiming at in particular? In our consulting, we have […]
Avoid Persuasive Misalignment Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: With only a miserly share of current cases ending up in a jury trial, the story on the state of the American jury is definitely a tale of dread, but also one that still has a little light at the end if the right changes could yet be made. Given
Honor the Ghosts of Juries Past, Present, and Yet to Come: A Christmas Carol Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Many Republicans believe that President Trump lost the election only due to widespread and systemic voter fraud. When Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, a Trump voter and donor, says that Democrat Joe Biden won on a legitimate count (and recount) of the votes, he is part of the
Watch Out for Self-Sealing Belief Systems Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Looking at the question, “What does a federal judge expect from an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA)?” U.S. District Court Judge Michael H. Simon of the District of Oregon, in a recent issue of the DOJ Journal of Federal Law and Practice (Simon, 2020), gives his answer in an acronym
Follow Judge Simon’s ‘Casa Le Pyro’ Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: It is becoming axiomatic that you can’t talk people out of hardened views. Particularly on political subjects; the common view is that we are in a “post-persuasion” era. Perhaps that depressing assumption explains why I was hopefully drawn toward a recent headline in The Atlantic magazine, “How We Got Trump Voters to
Take Some Lessons from “Deep Canvassing” Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: From readers of this blog, I sometimes hear, “I don’t always agree with you, but I always find you worth reading.” That is one of my favorite compliments, because of, and not despite, the disagreement. It wouldn’t be that interesting, after all, to stick with what everyone agrees on. Learning comes
Continue the Conversation Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: A couple of months ago, I helped to run the Online Courtroom Project’s demonstration jury trial using Zoom. Like a number of other experiments and actual trials going forward across the country, jurors showed up via laptop and camera to view voir dire, openings, witnesses, closings, and instructions, then moved to
Appreciate that Your Jurors Need Informal Conversation Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: These are stressful times, and there are many reasons to expect that your jury pool in the near future is going to be a little stressed out. In the article, “The Pandemic Juror,” (Wilson 2020) a University of Tennessee law professor noted what many of us have observed: Jurors who
Understand Juror Anxiety Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: When Trump associate Roger Stone was sentenced last month for obstruction of Congress and witness tampering, there was some pushback from media, Stone’s legal team, and the President himself targeting the jury’s foreperson, a focus of a recent post in this blog. As part of that pushback, we have seen some
Ask the Court to Help You Look for Stealth Jurors Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The art of training legal advocates has a long and honorable history. For example, the Socratic method used in law school is still an unbeatable way to teach critical thinking. But what about trial advocacy? On that score, many programs like NITA and some of our firm’s in-house programs have
Use B.A.T.A. to Get Better Read More »