By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The other day after helping select a jury, I stayed in court to watch the opening statements. Happily, the side I helped delivered a tight and simple theme-based opening that centered on two big problems with other side’s conduct. When it was our opponent’s side’s turn to open their case, […]
Credibility: Don’t Add the Halo Before You’ve Removed the Horns Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: It can be a common experience during a mock trial. You have a mock juror who ends up being way too focused on what they don’t know. They understand that there are limits to how much detail you can get into within the constraints of a shorter trial simulation, but
Combat “Partial-Picture Paralysis” in Your Mock Trial…And Your Real Trial Too Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The pandemic has been a lesson in a lot of things, including the challenges of using persuasion to build common agreement. In some ways, the past few years serve as a social science laboratory that litigators can learn from. For example, believe it or not, early on there was an
Practice Moral Reframing Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Our trial system is designed to restrict the factfinders’ information to that which is relevant, probative, and sound. When it comes to expert testimony, it is the responsibility of trial judge to ensure that the testimony has a reliable foundation. But in the case of science, particularly social science, that
Beware of Junk Science in Disguise Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In the vast majority of my experiences with the legal system, attorneys and parties are painstakingly civil, as a rule. However, in my two most recent trials, there have been notable exceptions to this rule. In one case, opposing counsel, after making discovery a miserable process for both counsel and
Reconsider the ‘Rambo Style’ in the Courtroom Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: There is a danger in what I call the “product” orientation toward persuasion. That orientation focuses on persuasion as an outcome, as a discrete “thing” that is transferred from a sender to a receiver. The advocate in effect thinks, “I have something — it is called a correct opinion — and
Persuade Through Process Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, it did not have to end up this way. At many points in time, and at many places along the course of this story, the individual sitting here with opposing counsel could have made a different choice. He could have taken a different path. He
Focus on the “Paths Not Taken” by the Other Side Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: If a manufacturer rushes an untested new product to market, did they do it to realize a gain (let’s say to increase profits by expanding into a new market) or to prevent or mitigate a loss (maybe to protect the company against an economic downturn)? The difference in this case
To Convince on Negligence, Frame It as “Gain” Read More »
That impulse to stop the billing is understandable, but it can also be penny-wise and pound foolish. When a crowded docket knocks your case off it’s scheduled date with destiny, of course it makes sense to adapt your preparation. But it also makes sense to take a few steps to make sure that your readiness for trial is retained, or even improved, during the gap. That impulse to stop the billing is understandable, but it can also be penny-wise and pound foolish. When a crowded docket knocks your case off it’s scheduled date with destiny, of course it makes sense to adapt your preparation. But it also makes sense to take a few steps to make sure that your readiness for trial is retained, or even improved, during the gap. In this post, I will share five practical ideas for keeping your pencil sharp when your trial preparation suddenly shifts from “Go” to “Stop.”
Adapt to Stop-and-Go Trial Schedules Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: If you remember even a few images from kindergarten, you probably remember the time when your teachers would lay out the mats — that was the cue that it is naptime. One might say that the similar cue in a courtroom is when one side or the other cues up
Play Recorded Testimony Without Creating Courtroom Naptime Read More »