Your Trial Message

Adapting to Jurors

Adapt to Stop-and-Go Trial Schedules

That impulse to stop the billing is understandable, but it can also be penny-wise and pound foolish. When a crowded docket knocks your case off it’s scheduled date with destiny, of course it makes sense to adapt your preparation. But it also makes sense to take a few steps to make sure that your readiness for trial is retained, or even improved, during the gap. That impulse to stop the billing is understandable, but it can also be penny-wise and pound foolish. When a crowded docket knocks your case off it’s scheduled date with destiny, of course it makes sense to adapt your preparation. But it also makes sense to take a few steps to make sure that your readiness for trial is retained, or even improved, during the gap. In this post, I will share five practical ideas for keeping your pencil sharp when your trial preparation suddenly shifts from “Go” to “Stop.”

Adapt to Stop-and-Go Trial Schedules Read More »

Loop Back and Reinforce the Punchline

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Some attorneys seem to have a natural ability to make themselves understood. They are able to connect with their audience while laying out central points that are clear, resonant, and influential. Other attorneys may be just as organized, prepared, and ultimately accurate…but still not able to get jurors to that point

Loop Back and Reinforce the Punchline Read More »

Better Instructions: Make Your Jurors Accountable Devil’s Advocates

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm Traditionally, we might think about what happens in the jury room as a kind of “Black box,” an unknown process with jurors keeping their secrets on how they got to their verdicts. In practice, however, we know a fair amount about what’s in that “box.” Based on both scholarly research

Better Instructions: Make Your Jurors Accountable Devil’s Advocates Read More »

Expect Jurors to Project Themselves into the Situation

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: A ‘Golden Rule’ argument is one that encourages jurors to put themselves in a party’s shoes and think about what they would or wouldn’t have done. It leads to an objection because it encourages the juror to embrace a personal conclusion that isn’t necessarily drawn from the facts. The Golden

Expect Jurors to Project Themselves into the Situation Read More »

Speak to Familiarity: Jurors Know What They Like, and Like What They Know

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: To jurors, most legal cases are unfamiliar by nature. Cases are about the agreement that jurors  weren’t a part of, the product they never used, the employer they never worked for. And, more broadly, the cases often rest on bodies of knowledge and forms of thought that are almost entirely

Speak to Familiarity: Jurors Know What They Like, and Like What They Know Read More »