By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: On a recent series of flights, I watched “Valley of the Boom,” an unconventional but highly- entertaining miniseries focusing on all of the shenanigans that accompanied the early 1990’s Silicon Valley technology boom and bust. It was a time when the public and investors alike were fascinated by the bright […]
Expect that Our Romance with Tech Companies Might Be Over Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: You probably learned it in one of your earliest writing classes: Active voice means the grammatical subject is doing the acting, and passive voice means the subject is acted upon. It is the difference between “The dog bit the boy” (active), and “The boy was bitten by the dog” (passive).
For Immediacy, Use Active Voice (but for Abstraction, Passive Voice Can Be Used) Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: There is a persistent belief among many mock jurors that I have seen in certain kinds of cases. The belief is that liability attaches automatically to possession, and jurors usually express it through the lens of home ownership. As one individual shared at a mock trial last week, “It is
Address the ‘My House, My Responsibility’ Analogy Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: God is Love Love is Blind Stevie Wonder is Blind Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God That’s an exaggerated version of a kind of fallacious thinking that is often used in witness examination. It is a form of the “transitive property” in logic, If A=B, and B=C, then A=C. This idea, however, is
Train Your Witness to Combat Simplistic Equivalence Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: When you are working on boiling down your message, there will often be that indefinable “something” that makes you recognize when you have the right language. A good trial theme, for example, doesn’t just summarize the strength of your case. As I’ve waxed before, the right theme will be based in language
Appreciate the Nuance of a Theme Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Juror 1: “The next category is ‘pain and suffering.’ How are we supposed to get to get that number?” Juror 2: “It is just whatever we want…there’s no guidance for it.“ Juror 1: “How are we supposed to do that? Put a dollar value on pain and suffering?“ Seeing an
Understand Jurors’ Process on Pain and Suffering Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Congress and the American public have been gripped by some unknowns recently. A whistleblower in the intelligence community made a claim that the Inspector General considered both credible and urgent. But, initially at least, that’s about all we knew because the whistleblower’s complaint was not provided, as the law requires,
Address the Central Unknown Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The government often plays a background role in civil litigation. An action, decision, or product from one party might meet the government’s regulations, for example. The question that raises is “Are the regulators trusted?” That question, it turns out, does not really have a simple “Yes” or “No” answer. Trust
Treat Trust as a Layered Thing Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: As I’ve written before, it is never safe to trust a potential juror’s own opinion about whether they are biased or not. That is because there has never been much support in the social science for that ability to self-diagnose. That, of course, has not stopped self-diagnosis from being the
Take It Seriously: Potential Jurors Cannot Self-Diagnose Their Bias Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In one of the many classic scenes from “My Cousin Vinny,” the hapless defense attorney played by Joe Pesci, delivers his brief but to-the-point opening statement (“Yeah, everything that guy just said is bullshit… Thank you.”), only to have the judge respond, “The entire opening statement, with the exception of
Don’t Get Spanked (By Your Judge…If You Can Avoid It) Read More »