Your Trial Message

Author name: ken.brodabahm

Account for the Media’s Effect (Even in Civil Cases)

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: A classic case of pretrial publicity is currently playing out in Steubenville, Ohio. After members of the hacker’s group called “Anonymous,” posted a photo and video linking two high school football players to the rape of a teenage girl and pointing toward an official effort to limit the scope of

Account for the Media’s Effect (Even in Civil Cases) Read More »

Respond to the Reptile

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Before a recent presentation, I was chatting with a Texas medical malpractice defense attorney when she shared the following: Plaintiffs’ lawyers have changed. They’re all talking about “safety” now, and that word is finding its way into every deposition: “What is the safe procedure?” or “What would’ve kept Mrs. Johnson

Respond to the Reptile Read More »

Switch Between Analysis and Empathy (Because You Won’t Get Both at the Same Time)

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Take a look at the picture above. See the duck (looking to the left)? Now, see the rabbit (looking to the right)? Now try to see them both at the same time. If you’re like most people, you can’t. Instead of seeing an image that is simultaneously a duck and

Switch Between Analysis and Empathy (Because You Won’t Get Both at the Same Time) Read More »

Beware of TMI: More Information Doesn’t Lead to Better Decisions

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: There is a disconnect between awareness and reality when it comes to the level of information presented in complex civil litigation. On the one hand, experienced litigators know that jurors can only absorb so much, and will be deciding a case based on the peaks and not the nooks and

Beware of TMI: More Information Doesn’t Lead to Better Decisions Read More »