By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: “Shoot for the moon,” that motivational saying goes, “and even if you miss, you’ll land among the stars.” Sounds nice, until the cynics (the kind who write demotivational posters) add, “…and die in the cold abyss of space.” Both the feel-good and the sarcastic versions of that sentiment have a […]
Counter the Plaintiff’s Damages Anchor (Especially When It’s Overboard) Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm – This blog frequently covers recent psychological or communications research bearing on legal persuasion, and an important question is how well results hold up when leaving the laboratory and entering the courtroom. One example is the phenomenon of damage “anchoring,” or the advantage gained when one side offers an ad damnum number as a starting point for jury deliberations.
When Arguing Damages, “Drop Anchor” Even in Murky Waters Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: As civil jury trials continue to become more scarce, the need to reasonably assess what result a jury would return in trial becomes even more important. Even when the trial does not happen — especially when it does not happen – clients, counsel, and insurers need a rational way to ground
Stop Speculating on Your Damages Exposure Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda-Bahm: The Covid pandemic is now mostly in the rear-view mirror, but in now busy courthouses across the country, the juries who are returning seem a little different. Based on common experience, they appear to have more anti-corporate attitudes and to harbor greater suspicion toward large institutions. They seem to have less
Defendants – Argue Damages Differently Read More »
Sometimes a chess player sacrifices a pawn to improve their position in the game. And sometimes a defendant concedes liability in order to focus the case on better ground. What are the considerations that go into that decision? In this post, I propose four questions.
Pick Your Battles: The “Should We Concede Liability?” Checklist Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The damage amounts awarded by civil juries can sometimes seem to be random or capricious. Lawyers and insurance representatives arguing for a settlement will sometimes call it a “crap-shoot.” It is true that there is no precise predictability to it. When you have a chance to see mock jurors deliberate
Damages: Guide Your Jurors so they get the ‘gist’ Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: So we have made it through the 2022 midterm elections. As is typical, the party out of power seems to have made some gains, although so far at least, the anticipated “Red Wave” doesn’t seem large enough to surf. Going into the election, the common wisdom was that that the broadly felt
Jury Damages: Expect the Fundamentals to Still Apply Even in a Down Economy Read More »
Need to Talk About Race in Trial? Watch for Language Polarization June 27, 2022 0 Stealing Thunder: Know When to Preempt and When to Wait June 20, 2022 0 Defend Your Product Testing Regimen: Seven Standards June 13, 2022 0 Masks in Court: Understand the Real Lesson June 9, 2022 0 Experts: Follow the Seven
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: As a legal category, punitive damages are not very common in U.S. civil trials, being available and awarded in just six percent of cases. But in the broader sense of “punitive,” the motivation to punish or to correct behavior doubtlessly underlies many other categories of damages. For example, the subjectively troublesome
Learn What Motivates Punitive Damages Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: What drives the motivation to not just compensate but to punish? When it comes to considering the purpose and amount of legal damages, the defense will predictably want a jury that, if they get to that stage at all, is focused on just paying the bills. They will concentrate on
The Pizza Scenario: Expect Punishment to be Driven by Both Equity and Retribution Read More »