Need to Talk About Race in Trial? Watch for Language Polarization June 27, 2022 0 Stealing Thunder: Know When to Preempt and When to Wait June 20, 2022 0 Defend Your Product Testing Regimen: Seven Standards June 13, 2022 0 Masks in Court: Understand the Real Lesson June 9, 2022 0 Experts: Follow the Seven […]
The Kamala Harris Challenge: Establish (or Reestablish) Your Credibility: Five Lessons August 6, 2024 Don’t Select Your Jury on Gut or Habit: Create a Unique Jury Profile for Every Case July 23, 2024 Profile Your Nuclear Juror (Based on the Research) July 16, 2024 Fight (Constitutionally) for Your Peremptory Strikes July 9, 2024 Learn from
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Anecdotally, I have seen it in a few recent cases: The deposition witness isn’t asked an open-ended question and isn’t given a “Yes or No” either. Instead, they are given a range of options, like you would see in an attitude survey or a school examination. For example, an employer
Prepare for Multiple Choice Questions in Deposition Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: It sometimes happens in the course of testimony: After what might have been a longer or misdirected answer, the witness will receive a stern admonition from either the questioning attorney, or worse, the judge: “Please listen carefully to the question and then simply answer ‘Yes’ or ‘No.’” That kind of
Witnesses: Protect Yourselves Against the “Just Answer Yes or No” Instruction Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The instructions for jurors are clear: They are to take an issue that has no effect on them, listen dispassionately to the evidence and arguments, apply the facts to the law, and make a decision. That is the model, but in reality other motivations creep in. In talking with jurors in mock
Know Your Jurors’ Anger Buttons Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In liability cases against physicians and other professionals, the plaintiffs work very hard to frame liability as a clear cut-and-dried mistake: The professional did something that wasn’t allowed, or failed to do something that was required. The simplicity of this approach, enshrined in the “Reptile” and “Rules of the Road”
Professional Liability Defense: Put It in the ‘Judgment Zone’ Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: At the voir dire stage of a jury trial, the word “bias” gets used a lot. But do we really know what it means? The courts, in practice at least, hew to a simple meaning: If a potential juror admits to bias, that means they know they can’t be fair
See the Social Roots of Bias Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: At the start of the case, a trial judge somberly addressed the jury, letting them know what adjustments were expected of them. The instructions told them they, “must as jurors, take all the decisions you have made, all the opinions you have about how people act, how people behave, what
Stop Asking Potential Jurors About What They Can ‘Set Aside’ Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: We’ve all heard the standard language in drug commercials: After a string of increasingly dire warnings about risks and side effects (a list that seems to nearly always end in “death”), a cheery voice will urge you to, “Ask your doctor if this drug is right for you!” While the
Ask Your Doctor If a Jury Is Right for You Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Sometimes, in the task of communicating technical or scientific information to the public, something can be lost in the translation. Of course, that is often a challenge for expert witnesses in courtroom settings, but currently, we are seeing it play out on the national stage. As the coronavirus vaccine is
Vaccine Alarmism: Learn Better Testimony from the Miscommunications of Science Read More »