Your Trial Message

Consider Confidence

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm:

8610742_m
In foreign policy, the projection of certainty and confidence can be as important as the strategy. On that score, it hasn’t been an easy few weeks for the Obama administration. While some find it refreshing for leaders to avoid quick bravado in response to complex world events, others have attacked everything from the President’s choice in suit color (“The Audacity of Taupe”) to the admission of a lack of strategy in response to events in Iraq and Syria. Critics argue that this lack of confidence projects uncertainty which weakens our position and emboldens our enemies. And there is another area where a lack of confidence can do the same: trials. When an attorney or witness conveys discomfort, uncertainty, or a lack of confident composure, jurors and judges will take that as a reflection on the case. Even when we know it isn’t true, we act as though it is: Winners are confident and losers aren’t. 

The research backs that up as well. In addition to decades of studies showing that confidence is a key component of credibility, a new study (Lamba & Nityananda, 2014) shows that even false confidence can be very convincing. People who overestimate their own abilities end up being seen as more talented than others and are more likely to get positive breaks in life. And the converse goes for those who underestimate their abilities. Both uncertainty as well as the overconfidence are likely to bleed over into an audience’s analysis. For jurors or judges, that means that their own sense of how a witness is doing on the stand, for example, will be strongly influenced by the witness’s own sense. This post takes a look at the study and then, confidently, draws out a few implications for witness preparation.

Research: Confidence Drives Credibility

It has long been noted by those studying the psychology of credibility that one of its strong components is confidence (along with competence and similarity). The reason confidence plays such an important role in our evaluations is probably because we see confidence as an outward sign of an inward certainty. And we believe, wishfully, that those who are most certain are also most likely to be right. We see this connection in a variety of settings, but in litigation particularly. Jurors are even asked as part of their instructions to look at a witness’s demeanor in evaluating the truthfulness of their testimony.

The new study (Lamba & Nityananda, 2014) is covered in a recent Psyblog post that provides a handy overview. The authors looked at interactions in university tutorial groups. Students were graded at the end of the term, but predicted their own grades and the grades of their group-mates along the way. The result: “Overconfident individuals are overrated by observers and underconfident individuals are judged by observers to be worse than they actually are.”

Overconfidence, it turns out, is persuasive. As co-author Vivek Nityananda is quoted in Psyblog, “It can be beneficial to have others believe you are better than you are and the best way to do this is to deceive yourself – which might be what we have evolved to do.” In other words, fake it until you make it.

Consider Confidence in Witness Preparation

Of course, no witness should ever be encouraged to “fake” anything. At the same time, because confidence is such an important factor in interpersonal evaluations, it should never be ignored in witness preparation.

Don’t Take Confidence for Granted

Experienced attorneys, consultants, and the witnesses themselves understand that confidence is important. Still, there can be a temptation for all three groups to treat confidence as the norm, or as the natural consequence of preparation. It certainly can be, but there might also be other reasons for a lack of confidence. Testimony also carries a substantive dimension, and for many witnesses, their confidence will come down to the question, “Did I do the right thing?” It is a question that matters equally for plaintiff and defense witnesses. In addition to familiarizing and practicing, diagnose the reasons for any lack of confidence on your witness’s part.

Don’t Use Preparation to Reduce Confidence

Lawyers tend to operate under the principle that working on something is the way to improve it. That’s often the case, but not always when it comes to the complicated and fragile phenomenon of human confidence. When working with witnesses, it is critical to avoid anything which would serve to make the witness less confident as a result. One example is what I call “prescription and proscription without practice.” In other words, many lawyers feel like a witness is “prepped” once they’ve experienced a briefing in which the lawyer has simply shared their list of “Do’s” and “Don’ts” as they apply generally and in the case. Without practice, and without the witness getting to the “Okay, I can do this” feeling, that list can simply serve to increase witness stress and reduce performance. Another tip is not to uncritically use video. I will often use it, but typically I do so when I can show the witness their own improvement. Few like to see themselves on video to begin with, and showing flaws alone just undermines confidence.

But Don’t Promote Overconfidence

In many settings, we think that the more confidence someone has, the better. Trial testimony is probably not a setting like that: There’s no cure for over-confidence quite like cross-examination. In the study discussed above, a little self-deception turns out to be a good thing, making others more likely to think highly of you. But in trial preparation, I think the goal is realism, not self-deception. That means that for some witnesses (e.g., those who are arrogant, who have an exaggerated view of the virtues of their own position, or have blinders toward the other side), you will need to talk them off that ledge of self-delusion and back down toward realism. The trick is to do so without reducing confidence. In some cases, leaving the witness with a little delusion is better. Ultimately, the question for preparation is always, “Am I making it better?”

______

Other Posts on Credibility:

______

Lamba, S. & Nityananda, V. (2014). Self-Deceived Individuals Are Better at Deceiving Others . PLOS ONE, August 27, 2014: DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104562

Image Credit: 123rf.com, used under license