By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: During voir dire, the traditional questions designed to expose bias tend to focus on the existence or nonexistence of a biasing attitude or experience. Have you formed any beliefs about the defendant’s guilt or innocence? Do you believe drug companies are more concerned with profits rather than people? In truth, these […]
To Elicit Bias, Ask About Leaning Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In New Jersey, a Plaintiff recently brought an auto personal injury case to trial. It was one of those scenarios where the damage to the occupants was greater than the damage to the vehicle, so the attorney trying the case properly wanted to know if any prospective jurors on the
Ask Open-Ended Questions to Select Your Jury Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Have you ever had the same advertisement chase you around the internet? So you looked at that new suitcase once, and now it is popping up on every page you view. That effect is one part of our current world, where marketers and other persuaders seem to know more and more
Consider the Small Chance that “Big Data” Might Pick Your Jury Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The peremptory challenge right now shares one problem with the two leading presidential contenders: high negatives. In the recent Foster v. Chatman case, the United States Supreme Court overturned a murder conviction due to the prosecutor’s use of peremptory strikes to eliminate African-Americans from the jury based on seemingly flimsy excuses such
Don’t Expect Cause Challenges to Do the Work of Peremptories Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In a recent jury selection, the attorneys, clients, and I were huddled over the seating grid for the panel, talking about our strikes. “I like Jones,” the client said, “with her background, she is really going to identify with our witnesses.” Those kinds of feelings are very common during this
Beware of “Frenemies” on Your Jury Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: I have a confession to make: I cannot resist joining political arguments on social media. I know, I know, no one ever changes their minds and nearly all discussions end in stalemate. But for a student of psychology, argumentation, and persuasion, they can be pretty illuminating nonetheless. And the biggest takeaway
Ask About News Sources in Voir Dire Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: One of the core narratives of our nation is that we are a melting pot, e pluribus unum and all. Today, however, we see our modern reality as more of a “mosaic” or “quilt” owing to the notion that the pieces don’t “melt,” but retain their uniqueness. The result is diversity, and a diversity in
Don’t Expect Reliable Juror Differences Based on National Origin Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The internet age has brought new tools but also new concerns to the task of jury selection. The ubiquity of social media and other forms of online presence has meant that lawyers, trial consultants, and other specialists now can and frequently do consider that information when selecting a jury. But that
Protect Juror Privacy But Don’t Ignore Public Information Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The rational legal model would say that jury selection should work something like this: The attorney asks if any of the potential jurors have any current knowledge or views on the case or the parties. The question is purely neutral and doesn’t, in the process, give away any knowledge or suggest
Move Beyond the Myths of Voir Dire Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In a pending battle of the Tech-Titans, Oracle is seeking $1 billion in damages in a copyright case on application programming, and Google is claiming a fair use defense. With those household names facing off, one would think that the case would warrant some additional time and process for voir dire —
Make Greater Use of Juror Questionnaires Read More »