Your Trial Message

Comprehension

Talk to the Eyes: If It Can’t Be Visualized, It’s Not a Story

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Stories require more than sequence. They require a sense of place, a tone, and a texture. Even when told without prepared images or video, a good story requires language that helps the mind “see” and not just comprehend the action. There is one study that perfectly captures this point (Tversky

Talk to the Eyes: If It Can’t Be Visualized, It’s Not a Story Read More »

Fight Fire With Fire (And Fight Bad Analogies With Better Ones)

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: If you are like me, you have grown tired of hearing that sublime tautology of a catch phrase, “It is what it is.” I want to shout in response, “Of course it is! What else would it be?” But the expression perfectly captures the attitude of some litigators toward analogies.

Fight Fire With Fire (And Fight Bad Analogies With Better Ones) Read More »

Close Your Case By Walking Through the Decision and Verdict Form (Another Note on the John Edwards Trial)

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Your opening is a story, I’ve written before, about what happened and about what kind of case this is. The closing is a different story, not about what happened, but what is about to happen: deliberations and a verdict, hopefully in your favor. It makes little sense to go all

Close Your Case By Walking Through the Decision and Verdict Form (Another Note on the John Edwards Trial) Read More »

Complex Case? Beware of “Low Effort Thinkers”

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: For once, a social science concept that comes with an easy to understand label! “Low effort thinking” refers to a mental approach or habit that serves as a short-cut in lieu of a more systematic or careful analysis. In the spirit of full disclosure, though, the concept is sometimes dressed up

Complex Case? Beware of “Low Effort Thinkers” Read More »

Female Attorneys: Expect (But Don’t Accept) a Subtle Bias in the Courtroom

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: I’ve sometimes been asked, “what is the effect of the attorney’s gender to a jury?”  It would sure be nice to be able to reply, “it doesn’t matter — a good attorney is a good attorney.”  But what does the data say?  Last week, the Forbes-affiliated “She Negotiates” blog reported on a survey

Female Attorneys: Expect (But Don’t Accept) a Subtle Bias in the Courtroom Read More »

Don’t Put “Story” on Too High a Pedestal

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Many hold that stories are essential to effective communication, and I am among them.  Especially in litigation, there is a natural role for stories as a glue holding together the facts and the law, the ethics and the evidence, the logic and the persuasion.  I believe that and apply it in my

Don’t Put “Story” on Too High a Pedestal Read More »

Mind the Gap: Stop Jurors From Jumping Straight From Liability to Damages

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: “Whatever happened to causation,” defendants sometimes wonder.  For example, a drug company is targeted for inadequate testing, and for attempting to hide research showing a statistical link to cancer.  The Plaintiff took the drug, and now has cancer.  For many jurors, that would prompt them to break out the check-book:  “Liability established… Lets talk

Mind the Gap: Stop Jurors From Jumping Straight From Liability to Damages Read More »

But Wait, There’s More: Build Your Case Over Time, Instead of All at Once

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: If that commercial for the knife set just laid it all out at the start, it would sound like this:  “Okay, here is the deal, you get the knives, the storage block, an extra set of steak knives, free sharpening for life, and free shipping if you call in the next hour.” 

But Wait, There’s More: Build Your Case Over Time, Instead of All at Once Read More »