By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: For many defense attorneys, there is a routine to the way that they’ll ask jurors to be fair at the start of their opening statement: There are two sides, you haven’t heard the whole story, please keep an open mind. It almost takes on the quality of a ritual incantation, done as much […]
Defense Opening: Give Jurors a Reason for an Open Mind, Not Just a Request for One Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Based on a recent and extensive report from New York’s Attorney General, the state’s Governor, Andrew Cuomo, is now facing numerous credible claims of a pattern of sexual harassment, with his fellow Democrats, including the President, calling on him to step down. Some of the claims against him, including the
The #When? of #MeToo: Know When Delayed Reports Are Credible Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The jurors assemble and begin watching the trial — not the actual jurors but the shadow jurors, the ones who are recruited by one side, matched to the real jurors, and offer feedback on the trial as it comes in. They watch opening statements, and each of the witnesses, and
Expect Another Silver Lining to Online Trials: Shadow Juries Just Got Easier and Safer Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: One trait of jurors is that, at the start of a case at least, they are not already savvy about the case’s subject matter. So, how do they learn? Through expert testimony. They won’t necessarily just sign-on to an expert’s conclusions, but they are likely to be influenced by both
The Wrapper and the Contents: Cross Their Expert on Both Levels Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: It is as if the public health groundhog emerged from its den, saw its shadow, and now promises six more months of confusion, polarization, and pandemic fatigue. With the more-transmissible Delta variant of the Coronavirus surging across the country, there is concern that we may not be over the hill
Once More, Into the Mask: Expect a Post-Pandemic Courtroom to be a Ways Off Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: A ‘Golden Rule’ argument is one that encourages jurors to put themselves in a party’s shoes and think about what they would or wouldn’t have done. It leads to an objection because it encourages the juror to embrace a personal conclusion that isn’t necessarily drawn from the facts. The Golden
Expect Jurors to Project Themselves into the Situation Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm In any challenging communication situation, it is best to combine the visual with the verbal. This is good practice because pictures tend to make things more “truthy,” in the sense that claims that are accompanied by relevant images are more likely to be considered true, even when logically the picture
Make Your Slides Less Texty: Six Tips Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: I often hear questions such as, “Do I want Millennials on my jury?” or “Are Boomers likely to be more conservative on damages?” This focus on the attributes of these generational groupings is part of larger fixation on the categories we can see during voir dire: age, race, income, etcetera.
Stop Relying on Generational Categories Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: During the past year or so, when clients have scheduled witness meetings or focus group and mock trial research, we will at some point get to the common question: “So, are we doing this in person or online?” Increasingly, it feels like the answer to that question ought to be
Embrace Hybrid Trial Preparation Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In the context of voir dire, the tension between social science and court practice is becoming close to intolerable. On the court side, we continue under the assumptions that potential jurors are aware of their biases (despite mounting evidence of bias “blind spots” and unconscious bias), that potential jurors are
Press for Extended Voir Dire (and Don’t Trust Judicial Rehabilitation) Read More »