By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: When preparing for trial testimony, often the focus is on what opposing counsel is going to do. You prepare for cross, naturally enough, because that is an adversarial moment. But my own view is that direct examination should get the same amount of preparatory attention. The questioning by friendly counsel, […]
Your Direct Examination: Know the Steps, but Let the Attorney Lead Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: A typical witness preparing for a civil trial often has only one good reference point for what their experience will be, and that is their deposition. That’s where they met opposing counsel, got a taste of that attorney’s style, and heard the questions that are likely to serve as the
Know How Your Testimony to the Jury Will Differ from Your Deposition Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Recently, three of the most high-profile current defendants did what conventional wisdom says they shouldn’t do; They took the stand in their own defense. Kyle Rittenhouse, on trial for killings at a Kenosha, Wisconsin protest, testified. Elizabeth Holmes, on trial in San Jose, California for fraud relating to her company,
Criminal Defendants Taking the Stand: Expect Conventional Wisdom to Change Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: I have worked with more than one defendant who simply could not resist it: Right out of the gate, in opening statement, they come out swinging against the plaintiff. They’re not being honest, they have their own share of wrongdoing, and they’re motivated by greed! It can feel good taking
Opening: Build Your House First, Then Take Aim at Their House Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: A number of years ago, innovators searching for ways to take some of the pain, delay, and difficulty out of the jury trial hit upon the idea to boil it down, rein in the discovery, simplify the rules of evidence, and try it to a smaller jury in a single day. For
Reconsider the Summary Jury Trial Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Kyle Rittenhouse, the then-minor charged with killing two and wounding a third at a protest in Kenosha Wisconsin in the Summer of 2020, took the stand in his own defense at his trial yesterday. The case is a kind of litmus test in our current polarized times, with one half
Expect a Complex Response to Emotional Testimony Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: This past Friday, eight people died at a music festival in Houston, crushed by a crowd as the music continued and security was unable to help. As the tragedy moves toward litigation, it is likely that this will be another case where there is a profusion of video, with dozens
Account for Camera Perspective Bias Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: How likely is it that a corporation’s competitor could come up with a parallel product without infringing a patent? How common is it for someone to get injured on an amusement park ride? How normal would it be for someone who gets regular physical exams to have an undiagnosed stage
Use Jurors’ Availability Bias Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: So it is time for your critical meeting with the Client. Are they coming to your office, or are you going to theirs? Or, maybe it is the new option: Let’s just meet on the cloud. An article this past week in the ABA Journal documents a pretty dramatic turn
Meet Your Clients on the Cloud Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, the individual on trial for killing two men and wounding a third at a Kenosha, Wisconsin protest in August 2020, the judge has set some terms on language. According to press reports, the judge has ruled that the Defense may characterize the men who
Consider the Connotations Read More »