By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: For those trained in the sciences, relying on illustrations or examples is not considered nearly as good as relying on data. If they call something “anecdotal,” then there is a good chance that the word “merely….” precedes it, and the adjective is being used to play down the point. From […]
Experts: Use Anecdotes, not Just Data Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Even if the pandemic is finally over, and even if it is the last pandemic we will ever experience — and both of those seem pretty optimistic — it is still worthwhile to study and to learn from the unprecedented adaptations we have seen the U.S. trial system make in
Know and Apply the Best Practices for the Online Courtroom Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: There was the childhood spent being a good student, then the hard years of college, and the even harder years of medical school, then residency, then years of building your expertise and your practice. Then came the event that many said was inevitable, but which you still thought you might
Account for Physician Litigation Stress Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Imagine you’re currently a citizen of the Russian Federation. The telephone rings, and the person on the other end of the line identifies themselves as a public opinion researcher, and they’re conducting a poll. “How do you feel about your country’s current ‘special military operation’ in Ukraine?” Well, given that
Avoid Social Desirability Bias in Voir Dire: Six Tips Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: When a juror looks at an act and declares it to be bad or good, where is that coming from? Well, hopefully, it is coming from the evidence. But inevitably, it is also coming from that juror’s own habits of moral judgment. And it isn’t just a choice formed in
Liberal and Conservative Jurors: Account for Different Moral Systems Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: As you are putting on your case at trial, and you go to call your next witness, there’s always a reaction from the jury box. It’s an opportunity for fresh attention from them, but it is often a bit of a mystery: Who is this new person? What is their role
First Answer in Direct: Introduce Yourself to the Jury Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Lawyers are notorious for using language that carries some comprehension challenges. When this “legalese” is directed to and understood by other lawyers, that use can be understandable, even if it is still annoying. But when it is directed at the public it can be a big source of failed communication. For example,
Limit the Legalese, and ‘Legalese’ Isn’t Just Jargon Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Maybe it is because monitors are a lot less expensive than they used to be, but I’m seeing more and more of them cropping up, often in the same places. Conference rooms or spaces for larger presentations that used to have a single monitor or a projector screen now will
Presenters: Try to Avoid Using Multiple Duplicate Screens Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Like the continuing need to have a ‘pocket mask’ in many places, the online judicial meeting or hearing has become an accepted fact of almost-post-pandemic life. But, chances are, the remote hearing will last longer (knock on wood). At this point, we are seeing systematic attention on the question of
Improve Your Online Hearing Efficiency Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The instructions for jurors are clear: They are to take an issue that has no effect on them, listen dispassionately to the evidence and arguments, apply the facts to the law, and make a decision. That is the model, but in reality other motivations creep in. In talking with jurors in mock
Know Your Jurors’ Anger Buttons Read More »