By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In the real world, disputes are often settled by someone with more or better knowledge, or at least someone claiming to have more or better knowledge. The courtroom, however, is different. It is a setting that is designed to ensure equality of knowledge. When it comes to the information that […]
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Speaking for most of us in the field of specialists who advise on jury selection, we like to say that “demographics are the least useful” of the factors that you might consider when you are evaluating a venire panel. Their experiences and their attitudes are critical, providing a foundation for
Expect Greater Blame from Older Americans Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In the days leading up to trial, you wrestle with the task of creating an opening statement in a complex case. Of course, you remember the core advice from your very first trial advocacy class, but the sheer complexity at this stage seems to be an obstacle. “How do I even start
Develop Your Story Early Read More »
by Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The simplest way to think about persuasion is as a transaction: You step up and make your best pitch, and then your target audience either accepts it or doesn’t. The conversational way of talking about whether our audience “buys what we’re selling” reinforces that view. But the more you think
Prime Before Persuasion Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Defense attorneys at this point, should have at least some familiarity with the Reptile approach that the plaintiffs’ bar is using as a route to persuasion. The idea of framing cases based on personal fear and threats to community safety has made significant inroads in medical negligence, products liability, personal
Look Out for the Reptile Mediation Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: Americans finally got to see the redacted report from Independent Counsel Robert Mueller last week. The report on Trump campaign issues relating to Russian election interference raised questions in a great variety of categories, one of those categories being the accuracy of Robert Barr’s summary of that report to Congress
Summarize With Care Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: When civil litigation is being discussed by those outside the courtroom and outside the legal field, what stands out is often the perception, at least, of very high damages. The high-dollar figure being awarded, based on a questionable claim, is the poster child for the abuses of litigation. But for
Normalize Your Damages: Five Ways Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: So you have worked up your case for trial and, now the question is, what is the best way to convert all of that factual detail and law into comprehension and persuasion? The answer you’ve probably heard since your first trial advocacy class is, “Tell a story!” And that’s the
Improve Your Storytelling: Seven Ways Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: In one scenario, a worker is on a ladder, painting a ceiling at a local mall. The mall’s management did not order enough safety lines and the worker decides to go ahead and paint without one. After falling and being seriously injured, he sues for damages. The experiment indicates that responsibility
Ask If Your Jurors’ Causal Thinking Is Based on Facts or Possibilities Read More »
By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The U.S. midterm elections are now in the rearview mirror, with the ballots counted and the races — most of them at least — settled. But with a mixed result, it is no surprise that we’re hearing complaints from both sides about possible corruption, with liberals focusing on online misinformation,
Expect that Jurors Might Think the System is Rigged Read More »