Your Trial Message

Author name: ken.brodabahm

Whatever Your Trial Solution, Don’t Forget About Communication

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: As our court system looks at the possibilities for trials under the current pandemic conditions, it seems like we face a choice: Restart trials in person, with distance, disinfectants, masks, and barriers; or move the process online with unequal technology, glitches, and lower fidelity. While there are certainly practical challenges

Whatever Your Trial Solution, Don’t Forget About Communication Read More »

Voir Dire on Content, Not Effect: Lessons from the Tsarnaev Appeal

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: We tend to think of “bias” as it applies to juries, but courts can have their own deep-seated practices. For example, judges will often prefer voir dire questions that focus on the juror’s own assessment of the influence of a given attitude or experience, not on the actual attitude or

Voir Dire on Content, Not Effect: Lessons from the Tsarnaev Appeal Read More »

Account for Proportionality Bias: Big Events Must Have Big Causes

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: The current global coronavirus pandemic is a huge disruption to life in nearly every country and the explanations for it have gotten to the point that they’re as big as the disruption. Rather than believing that a virus in Southern China simply transitioned from an animal to a human host,

Account for Proportionality Bias: Big Events Must Have Big Causes Read More »

Online Versus In-Person Deliberations: Consider Differences in Equal Participation

By Dr. Ken Broda Bahm: As the coronavirus pandemic drags on and intensifies, courts around the country are moving toward reopening in fits and starts, with distancing, temperature checks, masks, and hand sanitizer. Some courts are also exploring distanced alternatives, including in some cases trial by Zoom, or by other web-conferencing tools that allow jurors

Online Versus In-Person Deliberations: Consider Differences in Equal Participation Read More »